Publishers Weekly Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to Publishers Weekly Magazine

Author Sues Booksellers for Selling His Books

By Rachel Deahl -- Publishers Weekly, 6/17/2008 8:00:00 AM

A few weeks ago John Mitzel, proprietor of Calamus Books in Boston, was surprised to open his mail and discover he'd been named in a lawsuit filed by an author. The suit, filed by Larry Townsend's attorney for copyright infringement, stems from a dispute over unpaid fees allegedly owed the author by his distributor, the Oklahoma-based Nazca Plains Corp. Nonetheless, the suit charges that Mitzel, along with over 40 other booksellers (including Amazon and Barnes & Noble), infringed on Townsend's copyright by selling the author's books in his store.

Mitzel, who has been running Calamus, a GLBT bookstore, for eight years and, before that oversaw the now-defunct GLBT Glad Day Bookshop, found the suit puzzling since he has been selling Townsend's works for years. Calling Townsend "an old friend," Mitzel said he used to buy titles directly from the author--Townsend, who put himself on the map in the 1970's with the cult S&M guide The Leatherman's Handbook (and it's follow-up, The Leatherman's Handbook II) self-published and self-distributed his books for decades--until Nazca Plains started handling distribution.

Mitzel's attorney, Paul Glickman, said the suit seems to be nothing more than "a dispute over money between the defendant and his distributor," and questioned why the booksellers were named.

But the Los Angeles-based Valerie F. Horn, Townsend's attorney, said that although the claim is rooted in an issue with Nazca (which is, for all intents and purposes, an individual named Herbert R. Moseley), the bookstores are legally entangled. According to Horn, Nazca, aka Moseley, copied Townsend's works without permission and then distributed the books to the booksellers. This, she said, results in "liability to all those within the chain of distribution." Horn also added that whether the booksellers named knowingly or unknowingly sold ripped-off books is irrelevant, as per the copyright statute.

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

PW PARTNERS




 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

Advertisements





SUBSCRIBE to PW


Virtual Edition
NEWSLETTERS

PWDaily
Children's Bookshelf
PW Comics Week
Cooking the Books
Religion BookLine
Booksmack
LJXpress
LJ Academic Newswire
LJReview Alert
LJ Criticas Review Alert
SLJ Extra Helping
Curriculum Connections
SLJTeen
Please read our Privacy Policy

©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites