Publishers Weekly Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to Publishers Weekly Magazine

E-book University

Digital books thrive on campus and at university presses

by Craig Morgan Teicher -- Publishers Weekly, 7/7/2008

Universities may be the most likely footholds for the growth of new digital reading practices, as a just-released survey conducted by the digital content management company Ebrary in Palo Alto, Calif., suggests, and as two recently announced agreements between university presses and digital solutions companies confirm.

Princeton University Press picked a digital content management company at the end of June: Ingram Digital. Princeton will start out with around 500 frontlist and backlist titles, adding 100 more in the next few years. Working with Ingram Digital will give Princeton access to Ingram's Web-based Search and Discover software, the company's's version of digital book browsing, which includes widgets and other viral marketing tools, as well as the potential for POD printing through Lightning Source. Ingram is excited about selling its services to the university press and academic market, according to Tyler Ruse, v-p and general manager of content solutions for Ingram, which also handles digital content for Yale University Press. “I think that particular environment is ideal for the adoption of digital content,” said Ruse, who also pointed out that university presses are the core market for Lightning Source, and that Ingram's Vital Source business is specifically focused on digital textbooks.

As reported in PW Daily (June 26), Chicago Distribution Center (CDC), the distribution arm of the University of Chicago Press, signed with the Providence, R.I.-based digital content manager and packager Tizra to enable CDC clients to sell their books digitally. Tizra's flagship product is called the Agile PDF—publishers essentially send Tizra their books as .PDF files, and Tizra breaks them into fully tagged, searchable online books hosted by Tizra's servers, accessed through custom-designed, branded Web sites for each publisher. While the University of Chicago Press is the first, and only, CDC-distributed publisher signed on so far, other CDC publishers include University of Iowa Press and Stanford University Press, among other top university and academic publishers, so there's some exciting potential here, and CDC says other publishers will be in the program this summer.

But who's going to read all these digital books? As it turns out, many students already are, at least according to the 2008 Global Student E-Book Survey, conducted by Ebrary, one of the leading suppliers of digital books and other content to libraries. Ebrary polled 6,500 students in roughly 400 institutions worldwide. The survey shows students and researchers already trust and use e-books and other digital and online reference materials for research and assignments, because they're easy to search, share and access, at least from within libraries. While the survey points out that print books are still the most trusted information sources, e-books are gaining traction fast in academic settings.

 

Tomorrow's E-Reader?

Will the e-book reader of tomorrow look like the print book of today? Five researchers at the University of Maryland and the University of California, Berkeley, think it should. The research group presented a paper on their prototype for a dual-display e-book reader at the 2008 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems held in Florence, Italy, which seeks to foster discussion about human-computer interactions. The paper, “Navigation Techniques for Dual-Display E-Book Readers,” described the technical details of the prototype reader at length—it has two screens that can either be viewed like a book, displaying two successive pages, or the displays can be detached from each other, so one can, for instance, display a page in landscape view or display more than one document at a time. The pages even turn when you bring the displays together, mimicking the page-flipping motion of a paper book. Basically, the paper concludes that, while some book-like interactions actually take more effort for a user to reproduce on an electronic device, there are other advantages—such as the ability to view multiple texts at once. Is this where reading is headed? Only time will tell. —C.M.T.

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

PW PARTNERS




 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs

  • Alison Morris
    ShelfTalker: A Children's Bookseller's Blog

    February 9, 2010
    A Pint-Sized Hamlet
    One of the single most charming things I've ever seen is this video, in which actor Brian Cox ...
    More
  • Alison Morris
    ShelfTalker: A Children's Bookseller's Blog

    February 2, 2010
    The Pigeon Finds a... (ahem)
    Warning: Inappropriate humor! (But I just can't help myself...) Today I discovered that when...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

Advertisements





SUBSCRIBE to PW


Virtual Edition
NEWSLETTERS

PWDaily
Children's Bookshelf
PW Comics Week
Cooking the Books
Religion BookLine
Booksmack
LJXpress
LJ Academic Newswire
LJReview Alert
LJ Criticas Review Alert
SLJ Extra Helping
Curriculum Connections
SLJTeen
Please read our Privacy Policy

©2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites