Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
The Book Maven   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (5)


Why She Did It: Jo's Outing of Dumbledore
October 22, 2007

By now you've heard the not-so-shocking news: Albus Dumbledore is gay. (Click here for a reprint of the original AP story by Hillel Italie.)

I'm sure many groups are delighted and many groups are dismayed by this announcement. (Most readers of the series are probably fairly sanguine about it; after all, Dumbledore is more asexual in his lifestyle and actions than anything else.) But one group -- non-Harry-Potter fans -- may simply be confused. Why did J.K. Rowling reveal this now? Why does it matter?

                                                           

Let the delighted and dismayed debate this at their leisure. My perspective is a writerly one. When Mr. Bethanne (that non-Potter person) said "Oh for heaven's sake, why does this matter?" I answered without hesitation.

"Because she had to!" I said.

He looked askance at me, but then, he's used to doing so. I explained that when you're writing fiction, you get to know your characters so intimately that you know things about them that are never stated (as well as things about them that might not matter at all to your story, from toothpaste preferences to third-grade pencil box contents). When someone cares about your characters, it's such a joy -- you can talk about them at length and in detail.

Of course, J.K. Rowling gets to do that all the time (with good reason). While I have no doubt that Rowling had her reasons for her revelation last week that were strategic, maybe even political, I also think we should all remember that a writer takes real joy in her creations, and real pride in demonstrating that her characters are fully rounded, realized, complex ones.

Posted by Bethanne Patrick on October 22, 2007 | Comments (5)


October 22, 2007
In response to: Why She Did It: Jo's Outing of Dumbledore
D commented:

I know it, I agree with you that writers get to know their characters and have a lot of info stored away, but readers get to know these characters, too. I'm not in the least dismayed by D's preferences, but this fact is not a character fact in the book. If JKR wanted this and other facts to be a part of the character, she should have written them. Readers are instrumental in creating the world they are reading. We include all the facts the writer gives us and then we run with it. If she doesn't include it, it isn't a fact of the fictional world. Even if some speculate on it. There were a lot of stories about several of the characters that she only released in interviews. Not part of the end work. Was she or was she not ready to publish this book?




October 22, 2007
In response to: Why She Did It: Jo's Outing of Dumbledore
Bethanne commented:

D, excellent observations. However, do you think that it becomes a fact of the fictional world if you consider Dumbledore's behavior towards Grindelwald?




October 22, 2007
In response to: Why She Did It: Jo's Outing of Dumbledore
amy@wozabooks.com commented:

Jo can say whatever she wants about the fantasy world she has going on in her head, but I agree that if this is not revealed in the fiction then it isn't part of the story. If it was important to the story to know this, then it should have been in the books. The proof is in the pudding as they say. I think it's time for her to leave Potterland and move on to her next project. I hope she will be able to do it, because I'm looking forward to seeing what she produces next.




October 23, 2007
In response to: Why She Did It: Jo's Outing of Dumbledore
Nettle commented:

Anyone who has ever written something with characters they cared about know that there is always more going on with your characters than you tell the readers. Things that aren’t really relevant to the story, or that just don’t come up. But they are real things, nonetheless, as real as the ones that come out on paper. Jo knew that Dumbledore was gay. It wasn’t really all that relevant (though she does strongly suggest it with the Young Dumbledore and Grindelwald story.) She has always known it, it has always been true. It’s just the way it is.




October 24, 2007
In response to: Why She Did It: Jo's Outing of Dumbledore
Rick Speck commented:

The real trouble in doing this now is that she wrote up the unnatural relationship Dumbledore had with Potter gleefully as a tactic of Voldemort supporters. Now, if the character is truly "coming out," that relationship has to be questioned. As a parent, I feel she has said, "Thanks for the money, now f--- you." As a writer, I simply feel she has done a poor job of dealing with the issue. A simple "Dumbledore had a traumatic romantic experience, and had no love interests at the end," would have sufficed. Is she hoping the gay community will regenerate sales looking for hidden meanings throughout the series?





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement

Advertisements



VIRTUAL EDITION


Virtual Edition



©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites