Link This |
Email this |
Blog This |
Comments (5)
LitNotes: Putting Readers First, Take a Whiff, and More
July 17, 2007
For various reasons (you can't make me admit they have anything to do with summer), I've been behind in catching up on my book and publishing news for the past couple of weeks.
Oh, I might as well just tell the truth: I've been avoiding book and publishing news because I'm tired of Harry Potter and his creator, She Who Must Not Be Named else the search engines elevate her above the status of the Almighty.
It's official: The Book Maven is turning into a curmudgeon.
Happily, when I took my hands away from my eyes and actually read a bunch of magazines and newspapers (online, natch), I found that in among the Hogwarts weeds there were a few flowers of journalism (that's it; I'm banning myself from metaphor use). If anyone out there has found others, please share!
Dept. of Wonders Never Cease: A newspaper has actually figured out that if you want readers for your book section, it helps to focus your book section on... readers. Huzzah, Raleigh News-Observer! (P.S.: I'm sure your new Books editor Marcy Smith is great, but we all miss Peder Zane. A lot.)
Tell Your Kids You Did Inhale: At least if what you inhaled was the scent of a book. More of us are guilty than we might admit in print, as did Chicago Tribune reporter Patrick T. Reardon.
Why We All Bother: Globe and Mail columnist Rick Groen's math may be subjective, but it works for me: there are more good books out there than there are movies, television shows, or anything else. This piece is worth reading just to see if you agree with Groen's thesis that a bad market for serious writers is a good market for serious readers.
Posted by Bethanne Patrick on July 17, 2007 | Comments (5)