Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
The Book Maven   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (16)


Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
July 27, 2007

All right, so it won't be a week until midnight -- I don't blog on weekends.

I don't want to spoil anything for anyone (perhaps I should have designed a widget to look like the buttons some bookstores are passing out that say "I've finished, let's discuss" or "I'm not finished, no spoilers please!"). But the more I think back on HP 7, the more I feel manipulated. 

Please don't flame me. You don't have to agree with me. I truly loved reading the book and I'm not sorry I read it and I would read it again and I think that it's-wonderful-J.K.Rowling-has-gotten-so-many-people-reading blahblahblahblahblah. 

But there is something quite central, not just to the plot of this book but to the entire series, that is just a little too conveniently massaged. (See? I'm not telling what it is. No spoilers!) I know some reviewers have agreed with me (see? I'm not even linking to those reviews. I'm trying... ), and what I want to know is if other readers out there agree with me, too. Or if you don't! Because I'm all about keeping it real. 

Not only that -- but do you think that J.K. Rowling would have been able to resolve the series if she hadn't taken some license with this central problem? I personally think she flew her broom into a corner and needed some serious wand-waving to get out of it, but you might believe her solution was perfect...

Posted by Bethanne Patrick on July 27, 2007 | Comments (16)


July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Justin Golenbock commented:

I would only remind that perhaps this is supposed to be a book for 10 year olds...




July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
dan radovich commented:

I was pretty impressed by the way she tied up loose ends and still left the story open for continued adventures. My main complaints are who is the NEW Headmaster and what does HP do? I suspect any screenwriter will have a daunting task ahead. This is one book that CANNOT be edited down to meet a three hour film time.




July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Disappointed commented:

That, or possibly the enormous amount of money her decision has left available to her. I hate to think it, but somebody needs to put it out there. I felt it was a copout myself...




July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Michele M commented:

To Dan Radovich - JKR is planning an encyclopedia companion type book to answer your questions, but there was an article posted which includes spoilers from the Today Show. To Bethanne - I agree that it was just a little too conveniently done.




July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Jim Kelly commented:

I think the issue here is that this series started out designed for 10 year olds and they're now 20, give or take. They (we too) are, by now, used to suspense/mystery writing in which authors invent some sort of "magic" which just appears out of nowhere. The detective or other central character discovers her/his solution. The story ends satisfactorily. Granted this is a "kids'" fantasy series, but the increased use of the elements of suspense in Book #7 make me wonder what JK Rowling could do (probably under another name) writing in another genre!




July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Bethanne commented:

Justin Golenbock, hmmmmm... most 10-year-olds I know aren't convinced by the convenience of the one-cannot-live-while-the-other-surives manipulative shtick...




July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Vicki commented:

NOT MEANING TO GIVE ANYTHING AWAY--DON'T READ IF YOU HAVEN'T FINISHED...I'm going to re-read the end of book 6 to see if it gives me some answers. And the epilogue was a bit too tidy for me, and left too many questions: What do they do as adults? How is it that some kids don't know HP's fame/achievements in the wizarding world? Anyone else with me?




July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
I. Reilly commented:

Hmmm, I disagree with several of these comments. For one, it wasn't just 10-year-olds lining up to read this book, and besides, haven't we learned by now that kids books shouldn't be expected to be "dumbed down"? As for J.K. Rowling painting herself into a corner--I think this was the resolution she planned all along. She didn't pull a trick out of her hat to wrap things up--everything was set up and hinted at in all seven books. I was impressed by all the intricacies that were woven throughout the entire series and thought book seven was a perfect ending.




July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
LuAnn commented:

I, too, felt she wrote herself into a corner. I was very disappointed by the writing overall, but then I have to remind myself she's no literary giant, but she's a decent storyteller.




July 27, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
chenrae commented:

I don't care how great something is - there is always going to be an element of the public looking to pick out the imperfections. JKRowling has done something incredible here. She has written a children's series that is so satisfying to children that it has them reading books that are almost more than 2 inches thick, has adults discussing the merits of th series conclusion, and the adult press wondering how will the book industry maintain the increase in sales that the Harry Potter books created. If the ending was merely mediocre- which it is not-it is still one the best fantasys ever written. It has staying power way beyond its' best imitators. The ending was fabulous.I'm starting over.




July 28, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Kevin A. Lewis commented:

I'm reading in my spare time, so I'm only halfway through, but thanks to the jolly types who've been circulating spoilers, I kind of know what to expect... (It's still great fun, though) I response to your query of a couple of days back, everything I throw out here is off the top of my head; just marking time till I find an agent's assistant who is actually awake on the job, y'know? (And no, I wouldn't tell you what I'm shopping around-using other people's blogs for that kind of stuff is the height of rudeness, in my old-school opinion...




July 28, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Kevin A. Lewis commented:

One hasty HP afterthought Bethanne; did you happen to catch Lev Grossman's op-ed in Time a couple weeks back where he tried to portray JK Rowling as some sort of atheist fellow-traveller with Chris Hitchens, et.al.? Is this the most boneheaded comment of the century or what?




July 29, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Bethanne commented:

Kevin (after all these comments, may I call you Kevin, rather than Kevin A. Lewis?), I did not see that... and am going to go find it now. How bizarre!




July 29, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Kevin A. Lewis commented:

Time;week leading up to HP, if memory serves... Serious Weirdsville...




July 30, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Justin Golenbock commented:

Book Mav, You may be right about 10 year olds. That said, I don't think you'd be right about adults who write for 10 year olds. JK would hardly be the first YA author to end a long, beloved series with a slightly trite, good guy wins family and happiness ending. Jk has said she has no intentions of writing more Potter books or allowing anyone else to, and since she's done nothing to prove otherwise, I prefer to take her at her word. And I would debate that this is series that started with 10 year old readers who are now 20. While that is certainly true, I think the explosion of Potter mania we've seen from book 1 to book 7 has to be fueled by the continual discovery of these books by new waves of parents and kids. It's certainly got a pretty crazy universal appeal...




July 30, 2007
In response to: Who's Finished With Harry Potter?: One Week Later
Nancy commented:

I have yet to finish the series, but it is interesting to me how people think (as they did with the Goosebumps series) that HP is "getting kids reading." The day after The Deathly Hallows was released, I was watching CNN for a few minutes and the reporter doing the piece mentioned this assumption and talked about a very recent report regarding literacy in America. Turns out that, in fact, American children are NOT reading more. They may indeed read this "2 inch thick book" and yet, if they aren't reading anything else, would we all say that HP is good enough? So what will they do for an encore? Read it again? I think that the HP books are pretty interesting, but I think their attraction is more in the series-length (soap opera in book form) than that it is actually better or more interesting than other books already out there (or yet to be known). Reading--of all sorts--is so utterly important to the development of the self. HP and the neatly packaged outcome are fine, but real life leaves us with a lot more hanging questions. Not the least of which might be to wonder what Rowling HERSELF is going to do for an encore! :^)





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement

Advertisements



VIRTUAL EDITION


Virtual Edition



©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites