Link This |
Email this |
Blog This |
Comments (7)
The 300,000
March 24, 2008
Sara Nelson's latest editorial has really made me stop and think about what we need to do in the publishing industry to weather the latest economic storm. She writes: "We should be shaken up by economic realities, and we should respond by looking closely at what we do: at the ridiculous number of titles we publish every year (approaching 300,000), at the returns system, at outmoded publicity campaigns and distribution systems. There's no question that some of our old-fashioned ways—and, sorry to say, the people who perform them—need to change. As the old adage goes: Change or die."
It was the phrase about the number of titles that got me thinking. 300,000 really is a "ridiculous number," as Nelson says, when you consider it just as a number.
But what about readers? Even for the lowliest title in there, there' a reader. Or two. Or five thousand. And it's awfully difficult to predict which one will have thousands of readers, and which one will have just a dozen. That's both the frustration and the joy of our industry.
I personally believe that fewer books should be published, and that greater editorial control should be exercised, no matter what else happens. However, thinking about readers gives me pause and makes me wonder if there might be a way to provide more titles with less spending if publishers truly embraced new technologies, like print on demand and e-books.
I don't have an answer, so I'm hoping you will offer a few.
Posted by Bethanne Patrick on March 24, 2008 | Comments (7)