Publishers Weekly Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to Publishers Weekly Magazine
TALKBACK

Q&A: Bart Ehrman: Misquoting Jesus

-- Publishers Weekly,01/25/2006

A religious studies scholar at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has become a hot-selling author, thanks to his accessible account of how scribes changed the Bible as they reproduced it. Bart Ehrman’s Misquoting Jesus (Harper San Francisco, Nov.) was cited as a sleeper pre-Christmas hit by booksellers (“So-So Holiday Sales,” PW, Jan. 9) and reprinted three times after an initial run of 23,000.

RBL: Could you tell me about the structure of the book and what you aimed to achieve with it?

Ehrman: The book is about the New Testament and how we don’t have any of the originals of the books. We have copies that were made hundreds of years after the originals. [I address the question of] how they got copied and modified so that sometimes we’re reading a modified text rather than the original text.

RBL: Were you surprised the book sold so well in the month of December?

Ehrman: No (laughing). What really helped was the kind of media attention it got. I was on [NPR’s] Fresh Air and The Diane Rehm Show. That was a double-whammy that got people’s attention and it began the word of mouth. The other thing that attracted people to this book is that it begins by giving my own spiritual autobiography. I started out as an ultra-conservative evangelical Christian who thought that the words of the Bible were without error. In part it was my study of these manuscripts that made me realize we didn’t have the original words, and that made me change my views about the Bible. Eventually it came to have a very serious effect on my religious outlook.

RBL: What is your religious outlook now?

Ehrman: I’m a happy agnostic.

RBL: Why do you think the time was ripe for this?

Ehrman: Religion is fairly hot in the public discourse right now. And issues pertaining to the New Testament are hot. One of the reasons for the success of The Da Vinci Code is that it deals with unknown information about early Christianity, in that case Jesus and Mary Magdalene and their alleged marriage. My book is more information that people didn’t know about early Christianity, only this is not fiction. This is fact. People are right now very interested in the beginnings of the Christian religion.

RBL: What are you hoping ordinary people, not biblical scholars, will do with this new knowledge?

Ehrman: It’s part of a larger argument that early Christianity was very diverse. These scribes who copied the texts had different points of view that they sometimes implemented in their copies. For me this highlights the diversity of early Christianity, and my hope is that when people see how diverse Christianity was in its origins, they will be a little bit more tolerant of diversity in Christianity today.

This article originally appeared in the January 25, 2006 issue of Religion BookLine. For more information about Religion BookLine, including a sample and subscription information, click here »

Post a comment   Return to article   View other article discussions


Submitted by: W. Crabtree
3/15/2009 8:19:43 AM PT
Location:Virginia
Occupation:Retired Fire Battalion Chief

Mr. Landsbergen and others like him demonstrates why knowledge is so important in the world we live in today. Thank you Prof. Ehrman

Submitted by: R Hampton
2/24/2009 4:38:06 PM PT
Location:Fremont CA
Occupation:Tech

Avoiding unChristian Preaching
By David Kinnaman

One of the remarkable themes of the New Testament that seems too
rare is the insider-outsider dynamic. This is hard for Americans - a
very Christianized people with a rich Christian tradition - to fully
comprehend. But Paul, living in a clearly non-Christian context, never
seems to defend his rights as a Christian. Instead, Paul seems to accept
a sinful and broken world, while holding the people of Christ to
account. He is constantly writing in this dual role. He is an apostle (a
leader of churches) and missionary (an apologist and evangelist to
outsiders). He calls the Christian community to high standards and yet
reaffirms that these standards do not apply to those outside
Christianity (1 Corinthians 5 is one of the best examples of this).

What is the point for preaching today? Since your preaching is heard by
both Christians and non-Christians, you are both a leader of Christians
as well as a missionary to unbelievers. Finding that right balance is
incredibly difficult, but it can be done, with the help of the Holy Spirit.
Part of this task, I believe, is to help your people see their role as
missionaries to a culture that is now effectively post-Christian. You
have to help train them to see the world in the same way Paul did.


Submitted by: David Landsbergen
2/24/2009 3:55:02 PM PT
Location:Columbus,Ohio 43235
Occupation:Retired

Prof.Erman. My comment is: why don't you just be an agnostic and stop critisising Christianity and it s revealed truths, which has survived the lambasting for2000 years. Ever since the pharisees and the scribes the Church has survived and will continue to survive the deliberate acts to destroy Our Blessed Lord's founding of
the One,Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. History has shown it. Your doubts and unbelief do not change the truth . Can you imagine how long anyone would last teaching articles defying Judaism?? If you doubt historical facts ,are they only in reference to Christianity??? Remember: there is a judgement!!!!

Submitted by: David Landsbergen
2/24/2009 3:50:58 PM PT
Location:Columbus,Ohio 43235
Occupation:Retired

Prof.Erman. My comment is: why don't you just be an agnostic and stop critisising Christianity and it s revealed truths, which has survived the lambasting for2000 years. Ever since the pharisees and the scribes the Church has survived and will continue to survive the deliberate acts to destroy Our Blessed Lord's founding of
the One,Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. History has shown it. Your doubts and unbelief does not change the truth Can you imagine how long anyone would last teaching articles defying Judaism?? If you doubt historical facts ,is that only in reference to Christianity???

Submitted by: David Landsbergen (dlgl920@columbus.rr.com)
2/24/2009 3:48:41 PM PT
Location:Columbus,Ohio 43235
Occupation:Retired

Prof.Erman. My comment is: why don't you just be an agnostic and stop critisising Christianity and it s revealed truths, which has survived the lambasting for2000 years. Ever since the pharisees and the scribes the Church has survived and will continue to survive the deliberate acts to destroy Our Blessed Lord's founding of
the One,Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. History has shown it. Your doubts and unbelief does not change the truth Can you imagine how long anyone would last teaching articles defying Judaism?? If you doubt historical facts ,is that only in reference to Christianity???

Submitted by: David Landsbergen (dlgl920@columbus.rr.com)
2/24/2009 3:47:07 PM PT
Location:Columbus,Ohio 43235
Occupation:Retired

Prof.Erman. My comment is: why don't you just be an agnostic and stop critisising Christianity and it s revealed truths, which has survived the lambasting for2000 years. Ever since the pharisees and the scribes the Church has survived and will continue to survive the deliberate acts to destroy Our Blessed Lord's founding of
the One,Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. History has shown it. Your doubts and unbelief does not change the truth Can you imagine how long anyone would last teaching articles defying Judaism?? If you doubt historical facts ,is that only in reference to Judaism??

Post a comment   Return to article   View other article discussions


Advertisement
Advertisements



SUBSCRIBE to PW


Virtual Edition



©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites