cover image What It Means to Be Moral: Why Religion Is Not Necessary for Living an Ethical Life

What It Means to Be Moral: Why Religion Is Not Necessary for Living an Ethical Life

Phil Zuckerman. Counterpoint, $26 (400p) ISBN 978-1-64009-274-7

Sociologist Zuckerman (Society Without God) presents a prodigiously well-supported argument against religion in this meticulous but narrow work. Zuckerman concedes that people of faith do much good in the world, but they can also do bad, specifically the “more dogmatic fundamentalists” whose regressive politics are oppressive and hypocritical. Moving the aim implied by his subtitle, he claims that “it is theism, rather than religion... that comprises the true target of this book.” Theism, in his argument, is inherently not loving and compassionate, since God’s creations include as much misery as joy—he cites smallpox, which has killed 300 million people throughout history, as a primary example. He concludes that basing morality upon such a cruel deity makes morality arbitrary. Zuckerman lines up all the arguments against belief from the well-known Socratic dialogue, through the Enlightenment philosophers, and into the modern era. After exploring the history of religious skepticism and atheism, he presents seven “secular virtues”—freethinking, living in reality, “here-and-nowness,” empathy, cosmopolitanism, acceptance of existential mystery, and scientific empiricism—and explores how they can form the secular solution to immorality. Unfortunately, Zuckerman never seriously grapples with the allure or longevity of religious traditions, which limits the scope of his argument. While this is a comprehensive introduction to religious skepticism, Zuckerman’s conclusions will likely only convince fellow secularists. [em](Sept.) [/em]