Publishers Weekly Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to Publishers Weekly Magazine
Email
Learn RSS

PW's BookExpo America Blog   



Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (1)


BEA 2009: Austerity Measures - Larry Hughes

May 29, 2009

This is my first BEA as a “free agent.” In the past I always attended as a representative of a publishing company. This time I’m on my own. Without a booth to use as a base of operations, I was afraid I’d feel adrift and rootless.

Well, I do feel adrift and rootless, but so does everybody else. Because there are no booths.

That’s an exaggeration. Hachette has a substantial booth. In the current economic environment, it might even be considered ostentatious. I asked an employee how they could afford such an expense when everyone else is cutting back. “Because we’re making money,” he said. Neat trick!

Random House has a booth, but compared to RH booths of the past, it looks like somebody shrank it in the drier. Rumor is, employees are not allowed in unless they have a meeting scheduled. Lucky devils--I used to
dream of being barred from the booth.

But many publishers, including some pretty big ones, decided to save a buck and forgo a booth this year. Instead, they’re operating out of “meeting rooms” located in the most curious out-of-the-way nooks and crannies of the Javits Center—nowhere near the show floor, but within tantalizing aroma distance of the food courts. They have curious designations like 2C49 or 1A74. Ask three Javits staffers where, say, 2B63 is and you’ll get three different sets of directions that will lead you to three different corners of the convention center.

Publishers are also saving money on badges by having employees share them. One employee uses it to gain entry, takes care of their business, then heads out to hand off the badge to the next employee. Bad idea! How am I supposed to pretend to remember somebody’s name if I can’t trust their badge?
Awk-ward! It took me a while to catch on to this ploy, and I was amazed at how one major publishing company could have so many male employees named Sally.

Obviously these are austerity measures that publishers have fallen back on to save money in tough times. My question is, when the elusive recovery finally arrives and we’re all flush again, will they be rescinded? One publishing executive told me she expects each publisher to do a post-mortem and take the temperature of this show. If they deem it a success, even with no booth and a skeleton crew of staffers who all share the same name, they’ll have little incentive to drop big bucks on future shows. It’s possible we’ll see leaner BEAs for many years to come.

Click here for more BookExpo America 2009 coverage from PW.


Posted by PW's BEA Bloggers on May 29, 2009 | Comments (1)


Email
Learn RSS


June 1, 2009
In response to: BEA 2009: Austerity Measures - Larry Hughes
DIANE WILLIAMS commented:

Big publishers using the methods of us teenie-weenies. Interesting, isn't it?
A few years ago, if I had said my catalog was only available online I wouldn't have lived down the jeering.

Sharing badges is so, so . . . Writer's Row-ish. Ha!





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.

Advertisement

Advertisements



SUBSCRIBE to PW


Virtual Edition



©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites